"Spam Spam Spam Sausage and Spam!" The words from the hilarious Monty Python sketch play unbounded in my mind every time I hear the word "Spam".
Unfortunately these days the inedible version of Spam is far from funny as it clogs our Internet and wastes our valuable time filtering through garbage email. Some of these emails just happen to be scam Spam about a "Yahoo Lottery" that claims the recipient has won the Yahoo Lottery and these emails go on to request everything from social security numbers to credit card information in order to claim said prize. Well in case you didn't know there is no such thing as a Yahoo Lottery and Yahoo has had quite enough of hearing about it. Today Yahoo pronounced on the Yahoo Anecdotal blog that the company has decided to go after these spammers without mercy.
"We won’t tolerate these hoax emails or having our brand used to deceive you, and we’re seeking maximum damages permissible by law." Says Mark Risher in the posting.
In the meantime Mark offers five tips that it many unfortunate people wish they could have seen before they were scooped up and spit out by the Yahoo Lottery Scam. Don't make the same mistakes other unfortunate people have.
Here are some other resources available on current email and other Internet scams:
Is there a Yahoo! Lottery? - Yahoo's FAQ on the subject; where Yahoo's understandable frustration about the whole situation comes across loud and clear.
Google celebrates many holidays with pizazz by presenting a themed logo. On Memorial Day Google has not opted to provide a themed logo as long as I can remember, yet as Search Engine Journal depicted today many of the other search engines do a decent job of theming their logos.
So what is it with Google? Obviously no one in their right mind would have any problem with honoring active members, veterans and resting military personnel.
Photo Credit: I am afraid I found no attribution for the above photo on the website I found it on... if you know who took this please let me know as they should have proper credit for this amazing shot.
I decided to look into Google's explanation of their behaviour and found a forum post that claims to have a reply from Google on the subject; it certainly sounds like a Google reply to me.
From a forum post dated May 29th, 2006.
I sent an email to google asking them about this issue. Here is the answer they sent me:
Thank you for your note. We understand your interest in seeing a Memorial Day Google logo. If we were to commemorate this holiday, we'd want to express reverence; however, as Google's special logos tend to be lighthearted in nature, this would be a particularly challenging design. We wouldn't want to create a graphic that could be interpreted as disrespectful in any way.
We have a long list of holidays that we'd like to celebrate in the future. We have to balance this rotating calendar with the need to maintain the consistency of the Google homepage. We really appreciate your feedback regarding the Google logo, and please be assured that we're actively pursuing ways in which we can acknowledge Memorial Day and other such occasions in the future.
Regards, The Google Team
Link Caution: this page is where I found this post but please note the site has (in my opinion) questionable content outside of the link I provided. Please keep this in mind - unfortunately it seemed to have the only feedback from Google (that appeared legitimate) on this topic.
So what do you think? Does Google have a good point here? In my opinion Google is right that they should be concerned how they portray their themed logo for such a solemn day. That said, I think it sends the wrong message to break their themed-logo tradition on such an important day. In fact, Google's thoughtlessness clearly breeds confusion in the minds of many Americans.
What do you think? Speak up and leave a comment!
Post by Ross Dunn, CEO, StepForth Web Marketing Inc.
Written by Scott Van Achte and published at 11:51 AM
Google, Yahoo, and others are already there, and now Microsoft has decided to follow the leader with the launch of Mobile Display Ads.
On Tuesday Microsoft Announced it had opened the doors for advertisers to display banner ads directly to Windows Live Messenger and Hotmail mobile users.
Microsoft also rolled out its beta for keyword based advertising using Live Search Mobile, to be expanded in the second half of 2008. A select group of "invited advertisers can create keyword campaigns through Microsoft adCenter that target customers on the go. This will be the first time that Microsoft has enabled advertisers to monetize its popular mobile search service."
Mobile advertising and search is still in its very early stages and, in keeping with tradition, Microsoft has followed behind Google and Yahoo. If they ever hope to boost their market share and better compete with the two leaders, Microsoft should really try launching initiatives like this first rather then constantly playing catch-up.
The service is currently available to advertisers in France, Spain, the UK, and the US. As keeping with the trend of new web developments, Canada is still left out in the cold.
Written by Scott Van Achte and published at 11:47 AM
Avid users of Google Earth will now find a new layer added to the unique mapping system. Google News has recently been incorporated allowing users to see regional news related to the specific areas they are viewing.
For some time now the ability to find geo-tagged photos within Google Earth has been available, and it only makes sense that geographic news stories would also be made integrated into the service.
If you are interested in activating the Google News layer "navigate to the "Layers" menu on the left-hand side of Google Earth. Expanding the "Gallery" node in the layers tree will expose the "Google News" layer. Check the box next to the Google News layer and start zooming into the places on the globe in which you're interested. Each story is represented by a Google News icon on the globe. Clicking on the news icon opens up the news story's snippet, along with links to learn more about the event."
The launch of the new feature was announced Tuesday morning by Project Manager Brandon Badger on Google's Lat Long Blog.
Google is still by far the most popular of the 3 engines and therefore the AdWords Pay-Per-Click management system is the most utilized. As a result, AdWords is the most developed of the 3 systems.
If there is one thing I can say about Google it is that they are constantly coming out with new features. As there are a great many tools to cover, I have decided to leave off any sort of in depth look at them in this post. I will however, be writing a follow up looking exclusively at some additional features, particularly my personal favourite, which is AdWords Editor.
One important thing to note when first setting up a Google AdWords account, is the account type you select. The Starter Edition is very simple to use, but at a cost of being very limited in utility. If you select the Starter Edition, you can upgrade at any time to the much more robust Standard Edition. If however, you initially select or upgrade to the Standard Edition, you cannot revert to the Starter version. This generally should not be an issue unless you find the Standard issue too involved.
MCC
When I log in to AdWords, it’s generally into the MCC (My Client Center). This is a master account management shell that allows individual client accounts to be easily linked and navigated through from a single login. This isn't for an advertiser that simply wants to promote their products or services through a single account. For management of multiple accounts, using this provides a number of advantages:
You can jump from account to account using the top client list drop down or via the more detailed dashboard list.
It allows for a wide variety of customizable reports for any or all client accounts, including scheduling, creation of templates and emailing.
You can easily view alerts from any linked accounts.
You can create customizable templates for keyword or site targeted campaigns that can be used from any linked account. I find this extremely useful, as my initial setup for a lot of new campaigns is very similar and this saves time getting a basic structure up.
If you are AdWords Certified, the Pro Center tab allows access to your status page, access to various marketing tools as well as a link to your Promotional credits, which can be applied to any linked accounts, within the first 2 weeks of account creation.
Using the MCC is pretty straightforward and it allows for individual login information. This makes it simple for the client as well. They can log in and view their account details separately and even unlink their account from the MCC if they decide to move on their own or with another PPC management company.
Interface
Logging into a single account brings you to the account snapshot tab under the Campaign Management Section. In addition, there are 3 more top level tabs; these being Reports, Analytics and My Account. I’ll describe the features contained within these briefly.
Campaign Management
This section contains most of the “meat and potatoes” of what you’ll use to set up and run the account.
Account Snapshot – This provides an overview of basic information at a glance. It includes alerts, account status, announcements and a quick reference chart showing campaign performance. There is also an option at the bottom to make the Campaign Summary tab your start up page.
Campaign Summary – This is where most of the work is done. All of your campaigns are displayed with basic campaign level performance data. This page is where you can create new campaigns and is the entry point into the ad groups and the details of existing campaigns. I won’t go into detail as the process and the interface are pretty intuitive. I would like to say however, that the overall usability in this section of the interface is first rate. The ability to view data by date range up to and including the current day is something only Google provides easily.
Tools – This section contains a variety of tools to assist in optimization, analysis and a link to download the AdWords Editor software.
Template Library – This section only shows up in accounts linked to an MCC account. Campaign templates from the MCC will only be available here for use if they have been created and published from the MCC Template.
Conversion Tracking – In this section you can set up conversion tracking for the account. Multiple types can be set up for tracking leads, sign ups, views of a particular page or ecommerce purchases. When setting up tracking, Google will install a small bit of text with a feedback submission text snippet. The background colour for this is customizable, so it is a good idea to know what the page (where this code will be placed) looks like, to avoid a contrasting display.
Once the tracking type is set up and saved, you will have access to your conversion tracking code snippet, along with instructions on placement.
Website Optimizer – This is one of the features included in the Tools section. I guess by adding it prominently here as well means Google really, really wants this to be used. I will go into more detail on this feature in my next post.
Reports
In this section, you can create, view or export fully customizable reports. These can be set up for automatic scheduling and configured to email to multiple addresses.
Reports can be created for a variety of information, such as: Keyword, AD, URL, Ad Group, Campaign, Account, Search Query and Placement Performance.
They can be downloaded in either CSV, CSV (Excel), TSV formats. Alternatively, they can be exported as a Google spreadsheet, although I have yet to find any advantage to using a Google spreadsheet.
This interface will save your 15 most recent reports, although oddly enough there is a drop down to allow viewing of the last 100 reports, which still only shows the last 15 when selected. You can also create templates to save time with creation of similar types. There appears to be no restriction on the number of templates that can be created and saved.
Analytics
This section allows you to link your AdWords account to a Google Analytics account. Essentially, Google Analytics is the free, web-based version of the server-side Google Urchin program. This service can provide very useful metrics for determining traffic patterns, user behaviour and site or campaign performance. I plan on going into more detail on this service in a future post.
There are a few things to remember when linking these:
Only one AdWords account can be linked to a specific Analytics account. If you are working from within the MCC shell account, log out and login into the client account you wish to link. If you have 2 separate AdWords accounts, for best results, make a separate Google Analytics account for each, not just 2 different site profiles in one Analytics account.
Ensure you enable auto-tagging for the most accurate results.
For ease of disseminating PPC data, create a separate profile within your Analytics account specifically for AdWords information only.
Remember to correctly install the tracking code snippet on all pages of your site for the best possible coverage.
If this is set up incorrectly, you will need to make a request to Google support to have the account unlinked.
Note: When you set up the Analytics account, you are provided with a Javascript tracking code snippet. When you get to this stage, you’ll notice the code section has 2 tabs, one for legacy code (which you must use if you have Google Urchin installed on your web server) and the second is the newer code. Both codes work for Analytics, but if you have Urchin you must specifically use that code.
My Account
This section includes tabs containing information on editing for account settings, user access management and billing preferences.
Noteworthy is the one for viewing and downloading a billing summary. This summary is quite detailed, showing click charges day by day, credit adjustments applied for invalid clicks and invoicing/payment information.
Learning resources
Of the 3 engines, AdWords has by far the best materials available for learning how to use their system. The AdWords Learning Center provides detailed learning modules in both video and text format and has links for quizzes on most modules to test your retention.
If you are planning on taking the Google certification exam, prepare to spend a fair amount of time at the learning center. You will likely need it if you do not want to waste the $50 exam fee.
The help section within AdWords itself is also fairly useful and easier to navigate than most.
Support
Like the majority of other client support systems, you seem to get good and not so good support depending on how busy they are; it is the luck of the draw. Overall I would say that the response time to emails is generally pretty slow. I realize they are likely pretty busy all the time, but replies can often take days.
One tip I recommend to save time, and this is actually for any customer support resolution not just Google, is to make sure you define the exact nature of your request concisely and in the very first sentence of your email.
Every support system has its share of reps that skim the first line or 2 and fire off a cut and paste standard response to what they think your issue is and Google is no exception. Unfortunately, this quite often turns out to be completely irrelevant to your request and if you have waited 4 days to get a reply, that is a fair chunk of wasted time.
Google does not display their phone number anywhere. However, it is possible to get the support number if you request it from them, but even then their automated phone system is a bit of a maze to navigate through.
They do have one unique feature that I heartily approve of and that is the live chat system. You can access this through a link found in the Help section or through a somewhat more convoluted path via the “Contact Us” tab. Look for one of the images as displayed below and click on it to start an IM session with a support specialist.
While the live chat is certainly better than email, it is not very user friendly. A word wrap feature would go a long way, as it displays each message on one line. The window cannot be resized and you have to horizontally scroll through the entire length of each message.
Annoyances and Oddities
These are some of the gripes I have with AdWords.
Marginally annoying is the use of 2 separate fields for each Ad description line in the Ad creation process. Trying to fit in a useful description into 2 separate fields with a maximum of 35 characters in each can be awkward. In Yahoo and MSN you just plunk in the complete description and it will auto fit, unless you have too many characters of course. Still it is easier to adjust one big description than the 2 separate lines.
I’m not particularly impressed by the information displayed when looking up keyword status and quality score. Some of the explanations range from poorly worded and confusing to absolutely useless:
Although I know the reason why I got this one for that particular key phrase, the explanation seems contradictory.
This one’s a charm:
This is not even remotely about a similar range of issues. Now if the system identifies a problem and disallows the use of a word, surely the specific reason for the problem could be isolated and reported. This seems pretty sloppy Google.
I have had issues at times where very similar keywords in the ad group for the same amount of time, at the same max bid and similar levels of competition have 2 different quality scores. This in and of itself should not be unusual, however the more relevant keyword receives the lower score. In these instances the lower scoring keyword is what I would consider more relevant as it is the exact keyword used in both the ad and on the landing page. While close but not exact, the higher scoring keyword receives an ok score, even though it is not in the ad or on the landing page as such. This makes me question sometimes how relevant relevancy is :)
AdWords seems to have a built in governor, designed to not display ads if keyword bids are high and the daily budget is insufficient to sustain more than a few clicks. I was running a campaign with a particularly competitive keyword set and was getting little to no impressions. My colleague suggested that perhaps the budget was a problem, so I tested this by increasing the daily budget by a factor of 10. Almost immediately the number of impressions increased to the point that there was no doubt this was what had been blocking ad display.
If the budget is too low for more than a few clicks, Google should not arbitrarily decide to not show ads. Instead, the ads should be displayed until the budget is depleted, at which time ad display should cease. I would have thought this an anomaly; except that it happened on two separate accounts we were running for the same client.
Another thing that seems an unnecessary restriction, is limiting the use of the same keywords within the same account. Recently, we queried Google support about using the same keyword set for a client that has the same services, but in different and specific geographic locations. We were told, regardless of the difference in geo targeting we could not use the same keywords in the same account. This seems ridiculous to me. I had a client wanting to advertise a franchise in a number of different cities.
In this case it would make sense to use the same set of keywords, but with a separate campaign for each location, so ad copy could be tailored specifically to the area. I cannot see a disadvantage to searchers for allowing this. I can see, however, additional cost to the client if this is not allowed, both in the relatively minor fees for setting up additional accounts and in the amount of time it takes to set up and monitor these accounts.
This rant is not specific to Google alone, but I thought I would add it anyway. One thing I do a lot of is viewing data by date range; particularly when running forensics on a new client’s pre-existing account. I can view campaign performance from years ago and get lots of historical data on everything… except for the budget and the bids. Regardless of what year, month or day I am looking at, the budget and the assigned max bid reflect the current settings only. I guess it is because of the dynamic nature of the quality score and competition for the keywords that makes this difficult, but it is data I wish I could view.
There is also no ability to filter out newer campaigns, or ad groups, etc. when looking at older campaigns. Recently I was sifting through an account with a large number of campaigns that had been running for years. I wanted to get an overview of everything that had transpired with this over time and it made it that much more time consuming with all the clutter from additional ad groups and campaigns that did not even exist during the date ranges I was viewing.
Summary
Overall, I would have to say that Google AdWords is still the cream of the crop. It is still the provider for the largest share of traffic and they continue to improve its usability. The only big downside to this is there is a lot more competition in Google than in the smaller engines.
AdWords is also the only one to provide offline editing software, which means that they continue to be number one in my book at least until the others can get their act together on that score.
Last night I uploaded a new article to Search Engine Guide on 4Q which is an excellent free survey tool you can easily add to your website in order to improve the website and your marketing intelligence.
Written by Scott Van Achte and published at 11:16 AM
Microsoft offered a sneak peak back in February, and as of Tuesday the public beta of WorldWide Telescope has been made available, according to a Press Release issued by Microsoft.
The online virtual telescope has been created in response to Google’s launch of Google Sky a few years ago, and takes things to the next level with a huge database of high resolution images from various stars, galaxies, and other non-earthly entities. Ray Gould spoke about WorldWide Telescope back in February and noted that some of "the best images from the worlds greatest telescopes from earth and in space are woven them seamlessly to produce a holistic view of the Universe."
"The WorldWide Telescope is a powerful tool for science and education that makes it possible for everyone to explore the universe," said Bill Gates, chairman of Microsoft. "By combining terabytes of incredible imagery and data with easy-to-use software for viewing and moving through all that information, the WorldWide Telescope opens the door to new ways to see and experience the wonders of space. Our hope is that it will inspire young people to explore astronomy and science, and help researchers in their quest to better understand the universe."
WorldWide Telescope, Much like Google’s Earth & Sky products, is offered free and is currently available for download. While the user interface is quite different, the overall experience is very similar. WorldWide Telescope has a more modern and sleek interface than Google Sky, but in the end both have about the same to offer.
I prefer the Microsoft interface with easy graphic thumbnails to take you directly to the celestial body. Personally I find that this new beta release offers a higher level visual experience, which is why I would likely turn to it in the future.
Written by Scott Van Achte and published at 11:01 AM
The social web is rapidly growing and Google is trying to tap into this massive industry with the launch of Friend Connect. Released in a limited preview, Friend Connect allows web site owners to incorporate a number of gadgets to their site in an effort to improve the overall user experience.
Friend Connect helps webmasters make their websites more appealing, engage users, and help increase the average time on site. Incorporating a number of available social features is made easy, and does not require any programming skills whatsoever.
Webmasters select from a list of Google and Member gadgets, choose their colors and other options, and then simply cut and paste the code directly to their site.
When your site visitors opt in to use Friend Connect within your site, when they enter a review, post photos, or interact with your gadgets, notices are posted within their friends various social media accounts which can attract them to visit your site.
Currently Friend Connect is available only in a preview release, with select sites being accepted. If you are interested in participating, fill out the application form and cross your fingers that Google will accept you.
I am just on the way out the door but I caught this (opens in PDF) excellent news release by Nielsen/NetRatings stating that "one in four members of UK social networks use their phones to network." Now considering that Europeans tend to be dramatically ahead of North Americans in cellular adoption this statistics release seemed worth of attention.
Here is a chart that really drove home the popularity of social networking via mobiles (click the image for a larger version):
Whats the point? Nothing all that fancy, this is just more great evidence of the power of social marketing; and it seems the more evidence to convince skeptics the better.
Marketing Sherpa is my favorite site for catching up on the latest case studies on user behavior online; followed by another excellent publication called Alertbox. Marketing Sherpa's latest article does us all a service by illustrating how important it can be to have more transparent pricing for prospects visiting your website.
First ask yourself the question that Marketing Sherpa asked its respondents:
"Can you recall a technology/business purchase where a vendor got the sale (or the inside track) because they were more open than other vendors?"
From personal experience I can say that I am most certainly a part of the demographic negatively affected by sites that give no indication of pricing. Of course, as is carefully noted in the Marketing Sherpa article there are cases where accurate pricing is impossible or unlikely; where accurate service/product pricing requires customization based on interviews with the buyers. StepForth's SEO services are a good example of an exception since our services are heavily customized; however, even we decided to give some indication of the starting costs for any service we offer. I expect that is the least any business should do online. I know that seeing a starting cost ("Starting at $xxx") appeases my curiosity in most cases when I am shopping; at least I know if I should even look into the service further.
In the Marketing Sherpa article they provide a real life anecdote of a company shopping for print quotations. As it turned out the buyer ran into way too many inadequate sites but what won them over was a site that had a JavaScript service calculator that allowed them to estimate the cost which turned out to be only 5% different than the final 'real' quote provided by the business. Nice work, in fact I was curious enough to look into JavaScript and DHTML calculators myself to see how StepForth might incorporate one in the future.
What do you think? How do you feel about websites that require you contact them any indication of pricing?
The web is afire with the news that after its latest bid attempt to takeover Yahoo failed, Microsoft decided to back down. My desktop news widget is going wild with this news... updating every 30s or so with more updates from Wall Street Journal, CNN Money, Forbes, Information Week, CNet News, etc; hot news indeed. All those big time journals aside it appears that BoomTown's Kara Swisher was the first to break the news.
Mr. Jerry Yang CEO and Chief Yahoo Yahoo Inc. 701 First Avenue Sunnyvale, CA 94089
Dear Jerry:
After over three months, we have reached the conclusion of the process regarding a possible combination of Microsoft and Yahoo.
I first want to convey my personal thanks to you, your management team, and Yahoo's Board of Directors for your consideration of our proposal. I appreciate the time and attention all of you have given to this matter, and I especially appreciate the time that you have invested personally. I feel that our discussions this week have been particularly useful, providing me for the first time with real clarity on what is and is not possible.
I am disappointed that Yahoo has not moved towards accepting our offer. I first called you with our offer on January 31 because I believed that a combination of our two companies would have created real value for our respective shareholders and would have provided consumers, publishers, and advertisers with greater innovation and choice in the marketplace. Our decision to offer a 62 percent premium at that time reflected the strength of these convictions.
In our conversations this week, we conveyed our willingness to raise our offer to $33.00 per share, reflecting again our belief in this collective opportunity. This increase would have added approximately another $5 billion of value to your shareholders, compared to the current value of our initial offer. It also would have reflected a premium of over 70 percent compared to the price at which your stock closed on January 31. Yet it has proven insufficient, as your final position insisted on Microsoft paying yet another $5 billion or more, or at least another $4 per share above our $33.00 offer.
Also, after giving this week's conversations further thought, it is clear to me that it is not sensible for Microsoft to take our offer directly to your shareholders. This approach would necessarily involve a protracted proxy contest and eventually an exchange offer. Our discussions with you have led us to conclude that, in the interim, you would take steps that would make Yahoo undesirable as an acquisition for Microsoft.
We regard with particular concern your apparent planning to respond to a "hostile" bid by pursuing a new arrangement that would involve or lead to the outsourcing to Google of key paid Internet search terms offered by Yahoo today. In our view, such an arrangement with the dominant search provider would make an acquisition of Yahoo undesirable to us for a number of reasons:
-- First, it would fundamentally undermine Yahoo's own strategy and long-term viability by encouraging advertisers to use Google as opposed to your Panama paid search system. This would also fragment your search advertising and display advertising strategies and the ecosystem surrounding them. This would undermine the reliance on your display advertising business to fuel future growth.
-- Given this, it would impair Yahoo's ability to retain the talented engineers working on advertising systems that are important to our interest in a combination of our companies.
-- In addition, it would raise a host of regulatory and legal problems that no acquirer, including Microsoft, would want to inherit. Among other things, this would consolidate market share with the already-dominant paid search provider in a manner that would reduce competition and choice in the marketplace.
-- This would also effectively enable Google to set the prices for key search terms on both their and your search platforms and, in the process, raise prices charged to advertisers on Yahoo. In addition to whatever resulting legal problems, this seems unwise from a business perspective unless in fact one simply wishes to use this as a vehicle to exit the paid search business in favor of Google.
-- It could foreclose any chance of a combination with any other search provider that is not already relying on Google's search services.
Accordingly, your apparent plan to pursue such an arrangement in the event of a proxy contest or exchange offer leads me to the firm decision not to pursue such a path. Instead, I hereby formally withdraw Microsoft's proposal to acquire Yahoo.
We will move forward and will continue to innovate and grow our business at Microsoft with the talented team we have in place and potentially through strategic transactions with other business partners.
I still believe even today that our offer remains the only alternative put forward that provides your stockholders full and fair value for their shares. By failing to reach an agreement with us, you and your stockholders have left significant value on the table.
But clearly a deal is not to be.
Thank you again for the time we have spent together discussing this.
Steven A. Ballmer Chief Executive Officer Microsoft Corporation
Yahoo's Reply Yahoo's Chairman Roy Bostock issued a public statement that included some jubilant words from Jerry Yang about the "distraction of Microsoft's unsolicited bid":
"We remain focused on maximizing shareholder value and pursuing strategic opportunities that position Yahoo! for success and leadership in its markets. From the beginning of this process, our independent board and our management have been steadfast in our belief that Microsoft's offer undervalued the company and we are pleased that so many of our shareholders joined us in expressing that view. Yahoo! is profitable, growing, and executing well on its strategic plan to capture the large opportunities in the relatively young online advertising market. Our solid results for the first quarter of 2008 and increased full year 2008 operating cash flow outlook reflect the progress the company is making. Today, Yahoo! has:
-- a refined strategic focus to drive enhanced volume and yield;
-- reorganized to focus its efforts on its most promising products and services;
-- invested in innovations designed to revolutionize display advertising and facilitate closing the competitive gap in search; and
-- enhanced expense and resource management to support improved profitability."
Jerry Yang, co-founder and chief executive officer, Yahoo! Inc. added, "I am incredibly proud of the way our team has come together over the last three months. This process has underscored our unique and valuable strategic position. With the distraction of Microsoft's unsolicited proposal now behind us, we will be able to focus all of our energies on executing the most important transition in our history so that we can maximize our potential to the benefit of our shareholders, employees, partners and users."
BONUS - Ballmer's Internal Memo to Microsoft I came across this article at CNet a few minutes ago showing a copy of Steve Ballmer's internatl memo to Microsoft staff and felt it was worth including:
From: Steve Ballmer Sent: Saturday, May 03, 2008 5:18 PM To: Microsoft - All Employees (QBDG) Subject: Withdrawal of Offer to Acquire Yahoo!
This afternoon I sent the attached letter to Jerry Yang announcing that Microsoft has withdrawn its proposal to acquire Yahoo. We proposed the deal in the belief that a Microsoft-Yahoo merger would create a combined company with the resources and assets to win in the fast-growing market for advertising and online services.
Although the acquisition of Yahoo would have accelerated our ability to deliver on our strategy in advertising and online services, I remain confident that we can achieve our goals without Yahoo. We have a strategy in place to do so and we will continue to expand on this strategy and accelerate our progress.
Our strategy has three components:
Deliver on the basics. We will continue to improve search relevance and build out our ad platform.
Change the game through innovation. We will expand investments in engineering and deliver transformative tools and Web experiences.
Expand our global scale and focus. We will pursue partnerships and investments to realize the competitive advantages that come with scale.
At the heart of our strategy is a commitment to bring the benefits of competition, choice, and innovation to everyone who uses the Internet--from consumers to content creators to advertisers.
We are 100 percent focused on executing on this strategy and we have made good progress in a very short time. We've improved search relevance dramatically, introduced compelling new search verticals, successfully integrated Aquantive, and added nearly 100 new publishers to our ad platform. In the last couple of months we've rolled out new versions of key products including Internet Explorer and Silverlight, and introduced new technologies like Live Mesh. We now have over 430 million active users of our Windows Live services worldwide. And we continue to add new technologies with acquisitions such as YaData, which brings leading-edge behavioral targeting technology, and Caligari, which gives us advanced 3D modeling capabilities that will help us continue to improve Virtual Earth.
Ultimately, our goal is to build the industry-leading business in search, online advertising, media, and social networking.
We are absolutely committed to being the leader in each of these areas. Now is the time to do what we have always done best--be tenacious, focus on the long term, innovate, and keep working hard.
I want to thank all of you for your patience during this process and for your dedication and hard work across all of our businesses. We asked that you remain focused on our goals through these cycles, and you have done this extremely well. We are committed to making the investments that will enable us to compete and, ultimately, lead in the online services and advertising businesses. Together, I know we will succeed.
Steve
Oh Well Too bad, I had really hoped this merger would go through for entirely self serving reasons noted previously. That said, huge huge kudos are due to Jerry Yang and his impressive team. I have to wonder just how much sleep they managed to get over the past 3 months since Ballmer's 'unsolicited' kick in the teeth; they have been busier than a one-legged man in an arse kicking contest. Here is a rundown (I plan on updating it soon to bring it up to date) on what Yahoo was up to for only part of that 3 month process... it is a long list.
Here is the introductory paragraph for a little taster:
"Mobile web browsing is gaining popularity and acceptance thanks to the extensive proliferation of iPhones and other mobile appliances with surf-friendly interfaces. As a result it is becoming more and more important to offer a mobile-friendly alternative to your current website. The reality is, however, that many website owners seem to have no inclination to spend money on a medium that (as far as they know) is unproven and could generate zero income. Fortunately there is a way for every website owner to create an alternative to their website and not only is it exceedingly simple but it is FREE. Now no one has an excuse to ignore this growing medium!"