StepForth Web Marketing Inc.
Your Weekly Step Forth into the World of Search Engines
Wednesday - January 25th 2006
Highlight of the Week
Redefining the Search Scenery >>
SEO Tips The Major Players
Google Protecting Porn Profits? >>
Top Dirty Linking Tricks >>
  The Net Reality
StepForth Placement Moving >>
  Images not loading? - View the online version
This could be a result of your Outlook settings

Visit the StepForth Placement Homepage

StepForth's News Section
StepForth's latest search engine placement services
StepForth now contributes articles to both
Search Engine Guide and Web ProNews
Do you want to hear about the news as it comes?
The SEO Blog is our daily events post.
Free SEO Review Take the StepForth Review - Find out how search engine friendly your website is today

Highlight of the Week

Redefining the Search SceneryRedefining the Search Scenery

As expected, the roll out of change in the world of search is proving to be highly disruptive. Though the year is only three weeks old, noticeable shifts are occurring among the largest search entities and throughout the search marketing sector, making the scenery much different this month than it was just a few short weeks ago. These are among the most interesting times on the Internet as the largest players are positioning themselves to take their unique and collaborative runs through the year of global convergence.

For those interested in search marketing, a number of things will soon be different, most notably, our assumptions about the state of competition in the search sector. The three-way race between Google, Yahoo and MSN is, for all intents and purposes, over.

Yesterday, Yahoo's chief financial officer, Susan Decker, suffered the embarrassment of producing a poorly paraphrased quote. She made a simple, clear and brutally honest statement agreeing with a reality everybody else already perceived. It wasn't as much what she said.

Decker acknowledged in an interview with Bloomberg News that Google has a much larger share of the global search market than Yahoo does and that the gap is not likely to be bridged anytime soon.

"We don't think it's reasonable to assume we're going to gain a lot of share from Google,"Decker said. "It's not our goal to be No. 1 in Internet search. We would be very happy to maintain our market share."

The comment left some questioning Yahoo's long-term commitment to excellence and innovative search technologies. The attendant controversy stems in part from the way she chose to state the obvious but also in part from a public perception that Yahoo has not fully defined its place in the search sector. That three-way race metaphor wasn't working anymore.

Google dominates today's versions of search and both Yahoo and MSN are prepared to admit it. In short, the recent past and the persistent present belong to Google. For its formal rivals, the only place to look is the future. Time is accelerated, often to the point of pointlessness in the tech world and that future is already functioning online. It is just waiting mass user adoption.

The interview was conducted last week, just after Yahoo released fourth quarter financial results that, while wildly profitable, were seen as mildly disappointing by investors. Wall St. appeared to be expecting Google-sized gains from Yahoo, results even Google will have a hard time matching when they release their Q4 numbers next week.

As for the search marketing community, Yahoo actually delivered good news that was buried beneath Decker's first quote. Yahoo's CFO was also quoted saying, "We have held our own, and we should gain revenue share in the industry as we roll out these new initiatives. Our goal has been to hold our share and to be a leading, if not the leading, total marketing platform, which would include both brand and search."

Yahoo is improving its Yahoo Publisher Network and is almost ready to bring it out of beta. The YPN is a live experiment in online publishing built on the idea that an increasing number of individual web users will help funnel large amounts traffic based on shared interests.

Meanwhile, Microsoft appears to have been badly affected by losing the AOL deal to Google. It is almost as if Galileo's law of inertia is applied in double doses in the Pacific Northwest . Very little search related has moved forward from Microsoft over the past year though they do maintain a relatively good search engine.

A year ago, Bill Gates told the world it hadn't seen anything when it came to search. MSN search had just introduced its own algorithmic search engine and was ready to challenge Google. Nine months ago, Steve Ballmer noted MSN search was going to produce much better results than Google.

Six months ago, Microsoft reorganized its management structure to streamline integration between its software and Internet services divisions, challenging Ray Ozzie to bring it all together. Three months ago, Ballmer was said to be throwing chairs in a fit over how badly Google was beating Microsoft, notably around hiring and retaining talent.

A year later, the search results at MSN are pretty much the same and they still haven't introduced a search-advertising product to compete with Google's. Again, Google virtually owns the space.

In the face of Google's dominance, Microsoft is looking inward both figuratively and literally. The reorganization of its management system in the autumn of 2005 was the first clue to how Microsoft is preparing to redefine itself in relation to the search sector. Gates' comments at the Consumer Electronics Show earlier this month mark the second.

Microsoft is retrenching behind the operating system right now. While it is working to release its paid advertising program adCenter by the summer, much of its efforts are said to be going towards finally shipping the new Vista OS, with a number of search and e-commerce tools included.

Google's dominance of today's version of search is absolute, a big problem for Yahoo and MSN even as they look forward to an expanded search environment. Search is the primary way to access information on the web and in order to stay in business, Google's rivals need to segment the concepts of search and find ways to excel in specific areas while Google overshadows general search.

The next few months are going to seem like a waiting game until the bevy of new products already introduced or soon to be introduced, (and user adoption of those products), begins to change the way searchers look for information and results are compiled. There is going to be a lot more stuff available to the common searcher and a lot more sources to draw from.

Yahoo is thinking outside the box by inviting users to create their own media environments in order to facilitate distribution of pay-per-use content (TV, music, movies) and pay-per-click advertising.

MSN is again looking inside the box with its newly revised focus on Vista . It hopes to erase the lines between the user, their computing device and the Internet by integrating search and search related products into commonly used software packages.

Google will continue being Google. As long as it continues to build on its membership driven services and produce better than adequate search results, the general public is likely to continue using it more than any other search engine.

by Jim Hedger, News Editor
>> Resell SEO Services <<
Give Your Clients The Search Engine Placements They Need.
>> Take the StepForth Review <<
Find out how search engine friendly your website is today... (free!)
Important ©Copyright Note: readers are welcome to republish the content from StepForth Weekly newsletters
but we do require credit in the format that follows: "Article by <author>, StepForth Search Engine Placement Inc."

The Major Player Update

Google Protecting Porn Profits?

Google's refusal to turn over search records to the US Department of Justice (DOJ) might be more about protecting their own privacy than it is about protecting yours. That's the view put forth by Forbes.Com writers Chris Kraeuter and Rachel Rosmarin in a short piece titled, " Why Google Won't Give In ".

According to Nielsen NetRatings statistics cited in the Forbes article, about 25% of all web-surfers (38-million unique viewers) accessed pornographic content in December 2005. Google, which makes the vast majority of its revenues from the paid-ad click-throughs, stands to lose the most of all search engines if the Bush administration succeeds in restricting adult content and advertising.

In a worst-case scenario, Google's defiance of the DOJ subpoena becomes a political issue. The conservative media, known more for promoting political values than providing educational value, could tear Google several new ones, zeroing in on it as payback for defiance. Although Google provides all users a " SafeSearch "option to filter adult related content from search results, the massive size and population of the online red-light district threatens a virtual feeding frenzy in certain congressional circles.

Google has a lot to lose. Being spun into protectors of pornography by the under-achieving media and political elites does nothing good for Google's "Don't be Evil" image. Google could have a reputation management issue to handle. More importantly, a restriction on adult advertising presents a threat to Google's bottom line.

Earlier this week, I wrote that the short decline in Google's share values last week was not connected to the dispute with the DOJ. I might have been mistaken. If there is a connection between this case and Google share values, (I wrote there was none yesterday), this is it.

It should be noted, statistically speaking of course... Google almost certainly retains information that could show how many porn related requests came from virtually anywhere, including the computers of some (if not all) state and federal legislators. Protecting general information also protects that information. Don't be Evil indeed.

by Jim Hedger, News Editor

Top Dirty Linking Tricks

Part of achieving top search engine placement is through links from other Web pages. These links can come from people who like your site (natural links), reciprocal linking, directory submissions and a few other ways.

The goal of trading links is to get quality links for quality links.  True quality links will carry benefits far beyond that of attaining a coveted position in the search engine results.  The links will bring traffic from the Web page linking to your Web page. The problem with some links you might receive from other Web pages is only realized when you find the value of that link might be very small or non-existent.

Therefore, you want to ensure you trade or barter links from quality partners.

Sometimes it's hard to determine who is a quality linking partner, even for the experts . So, how can you tell if your link is on a Web page where its value will not be very good?

The short list below highlights ways of diminishing or nullifying the value of a link to your site from another Web page.

Meta Tag Masking - this old trick simply used CGI codes to hide the Meta tags from browsers while allowing search engines to actually see the Meta tags.

Robots Meta Instructions - using noindex and nofollow attributes lets the novice link partner see the visible page with their link while telling the search engines to ignore the page and the links found on the page.  Nofollow can be used while allowing the page to be indexed which gives the impression that the search engines will eventually count the link.

Rel=nofollow Attributes - this is not a real attribute based upon HTML standards, but rather it is an attribute approved by the search engines to help identify which links should not be followed.  This attribute is often used with blogs to prevent comment and link spam. The link will appear on the Web page and in the search engine's cache, but never be counted.

Dynamic Listing - dynamic listing is a result of having links appear randomly across a series of pages.  Each time the link is found on a new page, the search engines count consider the freshness of the link.  It is extremely possible that the link won't be on the same page upon the next search engine visitation.  So, the link from a partner displaying rotating, dynamic link listings rarely helps.

Floating List - this can be easily missed when checking link partners. Essentially, your link could be number one today, but as new link partners are added your link is moved down the list. This is harmful because the values of the links near the bottom of the list are considered to be of lesser value than the links at the top. With the floating list, it is possible to have your link moved to a new page whose PR value is significantly less or not existent and the new page may not be visited and indexed for months.

Old Cache - the caching date provided by Google indicates the last time the page was cached. Pages with lower PR values tend to be visited and cached less often than pages that have medium to high PR values. If the cache is more than six months old, it can be surmised that Google has little or no desire to revisit the page.

Denver Pages - while Denver , CO is a nice place to visit, Denver Pages are not a place you want to find a link to your site . Denver Pages typically have a large amount of links grouped into categories on the same page, making a mile high list.  These types of pages do not have any true value in the search engines and are not topically matched to your site.

Muddy Water Pages - these are dangerous and easy to spot. Your link will be piled in with non-topically matched links with no sense of order. It's like someone took all the links and thrown them in the air to see where they land. These are worse than the Denver Pages.

Cloaking - cloaking is the process of providing a page to people while providing a different page to search engines. You could be seeing your link on the Web page, but the search engines could possibly never see the link because they are provided with a different copy. Checking Google's cache is the only way to catch this ploy.

Dancing Robots - this can be easily performed with server-side scripting like PHP and is rarely easy to catch. In this situation people that attempt to view the robots.txt file receive a copy of the robots.txt file that does not include exclusion instructions for the search engines. However, when the search engines request the robots.txt file they receive the exclusion instructions. With this situation the links pages will never be linked and you'll never know why without expert assistance.

Meta Tags and Robots.txt Confusion - which instructions have the most weight?  Don't know the answer? Shame. Search engines do. If they conflict the document Meta tags are typically considered the rule to follow.

Link the Head - while these links do not count in the search engines and do not show up for live visitors on the Webpage, they do get counted by scripts or programs designed to verify the links exist. These programs only look for the URL within the source codes for the Web page.

Empty Anchors - this is a nasty trick, but it can be an honest mistake. The links exist and are counted by the search engines, but unfortunately are neither visible nor clickable on the Web page. So, there are no traffic values from the link.

The goal of trading links is to trade them for equal value. Understanding the ways people will attempt to prevent passing a quality value from their Web page to your Web page can help you avoid these useless links. If your link partner pulls under-handed tricks, the links they trade you are useless.

While you may never be an expert in knowing all the latest tricks, traps and tests, you can now become an expert in knowing the thirteen mentioned above. Ensuring your link partners are not following or using these tactics can help improve the quality of links you gain from other Web pages. By having quality links pointing to your Web page will you gain additional traffic through organic search engine results and visitors driven directly from your linking partners. 

Author: Lee Roberts,The Web Doctor®, is President/Founder of Rose Rock Design, Inc. website design company and Founder of the Apple Pie Shopping Cart, an ecommerce shopping cart.

2006 © Lee Roberts.  All Rights Reserved.

The Net Reality

StepForth Placement Moving

StepForth is leaving its quiet, residential space in the Fernwood neighbourhood of Victoria and moving downtown to its new Bastion Square offices.

The move is prompted in part by the tremendous growth of our industry over the past few years. We've grown too, bringing on new staff, upgraded services and a growing list of marketing partners.

Tomorrow (Thursday), will be our last full day in our current space. On Friday, we start the process of ripping out the servers, dismantling the office, disconnecting our computers and saying goodbye to the funkiest section of town.

We'll miss the Thin-Edge pizza parlor, the George and Dragon Pub, and our downstairs neighbour, "Fast Sammy" the convenience store owner. Our free-range mascot, Hydro the death-defying squirrel will also be remaining behind.

Our new offices are located in historic Bastion Square overlooking Victoria 's gorgeous harbour. Our new building houses some of the oldest offices in the Pacific Northwest region, originally built as a warehouse for supplies heading towards the Yukon gold-rush or to logging and mining interests on the north end of Vancouver Island .

Needless to say, we are all excited and a bit intimidated by the move.

As of Monday, our new address is:

StepForth Placement Inc.
#208, 26 Bastion Square
Victoria BC,
V8W 1H9

Please note that our phone numbers and email addresses will not change.

Toll Free (North America) : 1-877-385-5526
Local Phone Number: 250-385-1190

On behalf of the StepForth crew, I'd like to say thanks to the entire Fernwood neighbourhood. We're going miss it here.

 

by Jim Hedger, News Editor
 
Visit the SEO BLOG Regularly for Daily SEO Tips & Updates

If you have any questions please do not hesitate to call the StepForth staff:
Toll-Free: 1-877-385-5526 | Local: 385-1190
http://www.stepforth.com

To unsubscribe from this weekly newsletter simply reply to news@stepforth.com
and include "unsubscribe" as the subject.

Important ©Copyright Note: readers are welcome to republish the content from StepForth Weekly newsletters
but we do require credit in the format that follows: "Article by <author>, StepForth Search Engine Placement Inc."