StepForth Web Marketing Inc.
Your Weekly Step Forth into the World of Search Engines
Wednesday, August 10th 2005

Images not loading?
This could be a result of your Outlook settings.
View the online version

Highlight of the Week
Website Usability Leads to Conversions

Website Usability Leads to Conversions

Known as the web's Usability Czar, Jakob Nielsen is one of the Internet's most respected consultants, authors and commentators. Dr. Nielsen's fame stems from his uncanny ability to note basic things most observers miss or gloss over. Although many of his observations on website usability amount to basic common sense, his message is often ignored by small to medium sized business websites and by newer webmasters and search engine marketers.

The Doctor's message is fairly simple, "On the Web, usability is a necessary condition for survival. If a website is difficult to use, people leave." That is easy enough to understand. Keep it simple and visitors will use it. Make it difficult and visitors will find something easier to use. The popularity of the ultra-simple Google interface and subsequent gains made by Google at the expense of its info-heavy rivals over the past four years is a prime example. Dr. Nielsen work should be required reading for students of website design and search engine marketing. Similar concepts are taught to students of architecture, creative writing and engineering, fields that share a number of basic skill-sets with website design and marketing.

Jakob NielsenFor search marketers, there are important tips to be learned by studying Dr. Nielsen's ideas. In the early years of the industry, search marketing was mostly about getting Top10 placements for clients under their chosen keyword phrases. As the sector grows in size and sophistication, search marketers are expected to help their clients convert the increased traffic driven by high search placements into increased conversions and sales. In other words, getting a client into the Top10 organic placements and effectively managing PPC positioning is only half the challenge. Helping a site make sales by advising on usability issues is the second side to every coin earned by experienced search marketers.

There is a school of thought in the SEO sector that suggests optimization should be performed for the site users' benefit as opposed to algorithmic focused tricks and techniques. Sites that are designed to be easy for human visitors to use are often the easiest for search engine spiders to navigate. Better navigation options combined with search friendly site architecture and content tend to produce strong search engine placements and increased visitor retention. According to the findings of the Nielsen Normal Group , usability issues have an enormous effect on website revenues. As clients ultimately measure the success of search marketing campaigns by their ROI, search marketers might benefit from a quick review of some of Dr. Nielsen's basic ideas and observations.

Usability, as defined by Dr. Nielsen is, " ...a quality attribute that assesses how easy user interfaces are to use." In a short August 2003 essay titled, "Usability 101: An Introduction to Usability", Dr. Nielsen lists five quality components used to inform site builders, webmasters and content creators through the lifetime of unique site-designs. Each of these components leads to an assessment of an overall user experience working from the basic assumption that good experiences are appreciated and rewarded by online consumers.

The first quality component noted is labeled, "Learnability ".
When a new visitor enters a website, how easy is it for them to perform basic tasks like moving from point A to point B, gathering information, or using embedded tools such as maps, video-players or currency exchange calculators?

The second is labeled "Efficiency".
Once a new visitor gets used to the site, how quickly can they use the site and its tools to perform tasks?

Third on Dr. Nielsen's list is "Memorability".
On subsequent visits to a site, how quickly can users find their way around and use site tools and features?

The next component is labeled "Errors".
Web designers should ask how many errors do site visitors make, how severe are those errors, and how easy is it to recover from those errors?

The fifth component is labeled "Satisfaction".
How pleasant is the design and does the design please the user?

It is fairly easy to see how applying these simple tests of usability might affect website traffic, visitor retention and ultimately ROI.

In a widely published quote from his essay, Dr. Nielsen bluntly notes the importance of usability stating, "On the Web, usability is a necessary condition for survival. If a website is difficult to use, people leave. If the homepage fails to clearly state what a company offers and what users can do on the site, people leave. If users get lost on a website, they leave. If a website's information is hard to read or doesn't answer users' key questions, they leave . Note a pattern here? There's no such thing as a user reading a website manual or otherwise spending much time trying to figure out an interface. There are plenty of other websites available; leaving is the first line of defense when users encounter a difficulty."

Understanding these ideas is one thing. Employing them in site design is obviously more difficult. Designers and their consultants work in a bubble of online information and often neglect to consider user experience. For example, many sites are designed in the favourite colours of the designer. While a designer might like striking colours and psychedelic graphics, it doesn't necessarily mean folks visiting his or her site will. Similarly, site designers often know exactly where information and products can be found within the sites they build but the navigation options they often provide visitors serve to push traffic to competing sites.

As noted previously, many of the major search engines have taken Dr. Nielsen's theories to heart. Google, Yahoo, MSN and the rest spend a lot of time conducting discrete user research and overt beta testing, using the findings of their surveys to adapt page and product design to users' wants and needs.

In a recent Alertbox newsletter Dr. Nielsen noted that due to their growing obsession with site usability, "Yahoo! now makes 0.3 cents per page (equivalent to a CPM of $3)." He goes on to note that over the past four years, Yahoo! has seen a 28% average increase in page views each year with an increase of 15% per year in earnings per page view. Dr. Nielsen explains, "These numbers show that it was about twice as important for Yahoo's growth to find out what users want as it was to increase the monetization ratio."

In other words, focusing on the user experience over the investor experience tends to make both groups happiest in the long run. For search marketers, there are three important types of user experiences to consider: the search engines, site visitors and the clients. Common sense search engine optimization meets the needs of both search engines and site visitors because spider-friendly navigation and content is often the easiest for human visitors to use.

At the Search Engine Strategies Conference happening this week in San Jose , Barry Schwartz writes an interesting report on the Converting Visitors Into Buyers session. Points made by the two speakers, Bryan Eisenberg and Mike Sack are well worth the read.

Savvy search marketers already know about push and call-to-action techniques that help direct traffic from index page to product page. Learning how live-users relate to navigation prompts and integrating that knowledge into SEO redesign or consultation can help search marketers boost their clients' conversions and ultimately, their own bottom lines.

by Jim Hedger, News Editor

Important ©Copyright Note: readers are welcome to republish the content from StepForth Weekly newsletters
but we do require credit in the format that follows: "Article by <author>, StepForth Search Engine Placement Inc."
Resell SEO Services Give Your Clients The Search Engine Placements They Need.
Take the StepForth Review Find out how search engine friendly your website is today... (free!)

The Major Players

Google AdWords"Estimate Traffic" Feature Unreliable

It seems to me that for a company as large, successful, and experienced as Google, having a reliable estimation tool for their AdWords program wouldn't be so difficult.

Since the first time I set up an AdWords account I have never known the "Estimate Traffic" button to provide accurate results. Sometimes numbers are close, but mostly they are way off.

I was recently updating a small portion of larger AdWords campaign, and wanted to raise the bidding. Currently the rankings for these ads were sitting around the number 6 position, and I wanted to raise them up. The current max bid was set at 50 cents, so I raised it to 80 and clicked the "Estimate Traffic" button. Here is the summary I received...

Estimate Traffic Feature

This shows that by increasing the max bid, the average number of daily clicks will drop from 10/day to less than 0.1. The average cost will drop from 21 to 5 cents and daily costs from $2 to $0, but yet my average position will rise to the #1 Spot. If my ads will, on average, move up to the top spot, why would my traffic disappear?

Why is this happening?

In all campaigns I have worked on, big and small, popular and niche phrases, I have never found this estimate traffic tool to be accurate. In the above example there are, however, explanations. This specific AdGroup was brand new, set up only 24 hours prior. The phrases were searched, but not heavily, and the historic data within this specific AdGroup was minimal. Google does say, however, that estimations are based on previous historic data from all AdWords users. Now for a phrase that has never been bid on, I would expect a lack of data, but performing searches for any of the targeted phrases does provide live ads in the SERPS. One would think the numbers would at least make sense.

If this were the only time I had seen numbers that were non-sensible I wouldn't think twice, after all in this scenario much of it is explainable. However, I see this happening on a regular basis across a number of campaigns in a variety of industries.

This tool is for estimation purposes so I would never expect it to be 100% accurate, but it would be nice if some day Google could make it some what reliable, after all, if it doesn't provide accurate estimated traffic data, why have it in the first place?

by Scott Van Achte, Senior SEO


Netscape's Contribution, Ten Years Later

Yesterday marked the ten-year anniversary of the beginning of the greatest investment boom in history. On August 9, 1995, Netscape issued its initial public stock offering, which is widely regarded as the spark that set off the stock boom of the late 90's and set the stage for today's tech world. A lot has happened since then. Fortunes were made, lost at the mid-point and redistributed again through today's period of massive Internet growth. Many of the largest players a decade ago have vanished while others have survived and flourished.

Netscape is among the originals that survived, though often by the skin of its teeth. In the summer of 1995, if you were one of the growing numbers of people using the Internet, chances are you were surfing on a Netscape browser. Netscape held an 80%+ market share of the browser market but that changed very quickly in late August 1995 when Microsoft released a version of Windows95 with a bundled Internet Explorer.

In November 1998, AOL purchased Netscape for $4.3billion worth of stock, which due to the rapid inflation of stock prices at the time, was worth almost $9billion when the sale closed months later. AOL would go onto purchase the Time Warner publishing empire in January 2000 for approximately $160billion worth of stock transfers, two months before the beginning of the tech-stock meltdown and two months after Netscape released its disastrous 6.0 upgrade. Netscape was suddenly in a very bad spot.

For several years, Netscape appeared to be neglected though it provided the basic browser for AOL users. Many of today's non-AOL users relate to it as a Google-fed information portal, more of a search tool than a browser maker. In the background however, a team working on the original Mozilla browser technology that Netscape released in open-source format in 1998, developed the Firefox browser that was being fostered by AOL. Working on the AOL payroll until 2003 when they were offered a $2million donation as polite severance, the Mozilla Foundation released the highly popular FireFox in the autumn of 2004. It quickly grew in popularity and is now considered a common alternative to Microsoft's Internet Explorer.

Netscape has had a long and storied corporate history surviving as a brand name against the stiffest competition where literally thousands of others failed. Ten years is a long time in an industry that measures a generation in 18 - 24 month spans.

by Jim Hedger, News Editor
The Net Reality

Microsoft continues to separate fools from their money

As part of it's ongoing efforts to eliminate unsolicited Email, Microsoft announced a settlement of a suit against alleged "spam-king" Scott Richter and his email-marketing firm, OptInReallyBig LLC. As part of the settlement, Mr. Richter agreed to pay Microsoft $7million and has pledged to reform his business practices to prevent unsolicited email from reaching those who say they don't want it.

"The goal remains for us to separate spammers from their money," Microsoft general counsel Brad Smith told Reuters, "This is simply not going to be a profitable activity for people who engage in it."

Statements like that may sound more than welcome to the millions of Internet users who's boxes are over-filled with spam emails however Microsoft itself has been responsible for a fair share of spam over the years and folks like Mr. Richter represent the tip of a much larger iceberg.

Microsoft currently brought over 135 cases against spammers before the courts in the past two years. It says it plans to reinvest monies claimed from spammers in enforcement and monitoring programs.


by Jim Hedger, News Editor
Visit the SEO BLOG Regularly for Daily SEO Tips & Updates

If you have any questions please do not hesitate to call the StepForth staff:
Toll-Free: 1-877-385-5526 | Local: 385-1190
http://www.stepforth.com

To unsubscribe from this weekly newsletter simply reply to news@stepforth.com
and include "unsubscribe" as the subject

Important ©Copyright Note: readers are welcome to republish the content from StepForth Weekly newsletters
but we do require credit in the format that follows: "Article by <author>, StepForth Search Engine Placement Inc."