Your Weekly Step Forth into the World of Search Engines

» Visit the StepForth News Home Page

StepForth Search Engine Placement and OptimizationSEO News From StepForth Search Engine Placement Inc.
Wednesday, March 24th, 2004

Dear valued subscribers,

Welcome to StepForth’s weekly SEO update.

» If you wish more information then please view our news section.
» View StepForth's latest search engine optimization and search engine placement services
» Images not loading? This could be a result of your Outlook settings. View the online version.
» StepForth now contributes articles to both Search Engine Guide and WebProNews
» Do you want to hear about the news as it comes? The SEO Blog is our daily events post.

Highlights of the Week: STABILITY! For Now at Least...

From Florida to Austin, Redmond Wa to Sunnyvale Ca :: What a long, strange trip it's been...
Ask any expectant parent how long they feel nine months is. Nine months is approximately 270 days which makes 3/4 of a year. That's a fairly long time in our lives. Fortunes have been made in shorter times. As survivors of the tech-meltdown of 2000 remember, fortunes have also been lost in less time. The past nine months have been extremely frustrating for many webmasters and businesses dependent on search engine advertising. Since the beginning of 2003 the search engine world has been redrawn with mergers, new technologies, new fee structures and, most impactfully, new ranking algorithms. Many of the changes in the industry have come without any warning, the most relevant example being Google's November Florida Update. The impact on the sector and those relying on the sector has been enormous but, aside from news we know is coming, it looks like we've seen the bulk of changes for the next few months! Before a collective sigh of relief can be heard from professionals in the SEO industry, we need to remember, this time is more like the eye of a hurricane than a beautiful sunny day. In other words, we may be on the plateau but there's still an ever changing mountain to climb. A topic we've been tackling over the past week involves how to plan for future changes today in order to best position our clients. While we maintain a fairly well polished crystal ball, there's no way to really know how change will effect the business of SEO. The best way to insulate clients from a tidal wave of change is to provide a buffer of information. Here's what we know is coming in the future...

MSN to introduce its own search engine in July 2004!
It's big. It's powerful. It has been one of the prime focuses of the world's most powerful corporation. As of July, it will be in your office, school and living room. Microsoft has announced that as of July 2004, it will be using its own search engine to power results found at MSN.Com/. Claiming to be "much further along in relevancy", MSN product manager, Karen Redetzki told Forbes magazine last week, "MSN was making steady progress and that July's launch will reflect results driven by a revamped search engine with better algorithms." We know that Bill Gates dislikes anything that presents a challenge to Microsoft supremacy in any field, especially those fields covering gold mines. He was quoted at the World Economic Forum in Davos Switzerland saying "Google kicked our butts". We know that MSN has a highly active spider known as MSN-bot that has been visibly compiling information by visiting websites multiple times per month. We also know that the new search tool was supposed to be introduced in conjunction with the new operating system code-named "Longhorn". Longhorn's release date was originally scheduled for late 2004 but was pushed to June of 2005. Most recent rumours say Longhorn will not be ready until mid-2006! Clearly a decision was made in Redmond to push the development of MSN-Search forward over the development of the new O/S. In their competition with Google and Yahoo, MSN is about to show us what an 800lb gorilla looks like.

Google improves search relevancy and starts to challenge Yahoo on Local Search
Google has appeared stable for over four weeks now! Since July 2003, Google had been presenting somewhat questionable results, a problem that seemed to cascade on them until November's Florida Update when the entire index turned itself upside down. Google has greatly improved the relevancy of its results over the past two months. While there are still thousands of webmasters who might disagree with me, based on the continued poor performance of their sites in Google, for the most part, Google's results are almost as good as they were before the infamous Florida update of November. Google is still making minor tweaks to its ranking algorithm, at least one of which is obviously designed to limit the power of Bloggers to "Google-Bomb", or game Google's results by getting 20,000 of your closest friends to put a common link with common anchor text on their sites. Google also appears to be experimenting with the value of other incoming links but it is still too soon to tell exactly what they are doing here as we have only seen one major update of Google's database this month.

Yahoo shows Yahoo! WebRank
Yahoo has named its algorithm and introduced a toolbar to go with it. Yahoo is calling its algorithm "WebRank", (not to be confused with Google's "PageRank"). WebRank seems similar to PageRank in more ways than the name. Yahoo is said to be measuring the value of incoming links, the time spent on a site by visitors, visitor traffic through a site, and the arrangement and ratio of keywords appearing on a page or site. Exactly how Yahoo measures the value of an incoming link is still an unknown quantity but it is likely safe to assume Yahoo will value site elements in a similar fashion to Google. We know that Yahoo-Slurp will operate much like Google-Bot by following links and recording information found on pages it comes across. It is not known if paid-inclusion through Yahoo Site-Match will have an overt effect on WebRank but the increased frequency of spidering given to a URL that has paid for inclusion should, logically, make a huge difference.

Search Engine Advertising in General
We know that revenue generation is the leading driver of search engine development among the biggest players in the sector. MSN, Yahoo and Google are all trying to position themselves to capture as much of this rapidly growing revenue as they possible can. Google and Yahoo accomplish this primarily through the sale of contextual advertising opportunities such as AdWords and Overture. MSN will continue to display contextual advertising on its search tool as well but it is not known if or when they will develop an in-house contextual advertising program. Currently, MSN is pulling its contextual ads from Overture. Many of the smaller players in the search engine world are also introducing contextual advertising programs including Lycos, Looksmart and Kanoodle. Unless something major happens in the next seven days, we'll look at contextual advertising and the impact on search engine marketing in next week's edition.

The Eye is Quite
As an industry, search is growing up and, like most adolescents, is defining itself through decisions and actions taken during its adolescent phase. Search is the second most used application on the Internet, (after Email), and the only way to make any sort of sense of an environment that now has more unique URLs than the planet has people. The industry will continue to change as time goes on but for now, it looks like we might have a short break in the rapidity of change. Somewhat like the eye of a hurricane.

Important ©Copyright Note: readers are welcome to republish the content from StepForth Weekly newsletters
but we do require credit in the format that follows: "Article by <author>, StepForth Search Engine Placement Inc."
Major Player Updates: Microsoft Feels the Teeth of the EU's Judicial System

The European Commission (EC) just smacked Microsoft with a fine worthy of a tabloid. $613Million is the fine-to-date that the EC served Microsoft as it branded the huge corporation an abusive monopolist. Believe it or not, this fine was not even near the mid-way point on the EC's maximum fine of 10% of the annual earnings for the target company. In the case of Microsoft, this could have meant over $3.5Billion in reparations.

Is this the end of troubles for Microsoft? Hardly! Here is a list of some serious outstanding litigation facing the software giant:

(The following is an excerpt from the Associated Press in an article at Mercury News.com)

  • MORE FROM THE EU: EU officials still are investigating competitors' charges that Windows XP is designed to extend Microsoft's dominance into new markets such as instant messaging and mobile phones.
  • STATE CASE: A lawsuit in Minnesota alleges Microsoft overcharged about 1 million people or businesses in the state between 1994 and 2001. Microsoft has settled similar antitrust cases in nine states and Washington, D.C., for $1.5 billion.
  • NATIONAL ANTITRUST CASE: Microsoft awaits a U.S. appeals court ruling on whether sanctions in the federal settlement were adequate. Massachusetts is pressing for tougher penalties.
  • PRIVATE SUITS: Microsoft's Seattle-based rival RealNetworks Inc. has sued the company, alleging it illegally monopolized the field of digital media by including its Windows Media Player with its Windows operating system. Microsoft denies it.
  • JAPANESE PROBE: In February, officials from Japan's fair trade watchdog raided Microsoft offices on suspicion of monopoly law violations - in particular, whether Microsoft attached overly restrictive conditions to deals with computer makers. Microsoft said it had already dropped a controversial provision of those contracts but was cooperating with authorities.
  • LINUX: Governments and companies are increasingly eyeing the open-source operating system as a less expensive and more secure alternative to Windows.

    (end of excerpt from Mercury News)

So what does this mean for you and your future Microsoft software? At this point everything we have heard seems to be conjecture, however, you can bet that when Microsoft launches its new subscription-based software there will be some very 'healthy' annual fees.

Pay-Per-Click Tip: What is a strong click through rate?

I recently read in Search Engine Forums a question about Click Through Rates (CTR). The question was regarding whether or not a CTR of 8.1% is good or bad. In another thread someone was asking about average CTR’s.

Here’s my take on it. Lets use the all so popular widget example, lets say widgets are the Furby of 2004 and everyone wants one. Naturally, among others, you may want to target ‘widget’ for your PPC Campaign (along with every other retailer). Chances are your ad will be diluted among many others, which will result in a lower CTR. (lets say 1.5%). If the competition is fierce, 1.5% could be a very acceptable rate, especially if there are tens of thousands of searches a day.

But lets say you decide to target ‘blue widget with red stripe,’ and your ad has absolutely no competition for this term. If this is the case, chances are there will be very few searches, maybe only one or two a day. If your ad is all by itself, chances are you will draw much more attention, it will stand out, and you will get a much higher CTR. I have seen examples of this where highly targeted terms generate as high as 88%. Keep in mind this does not mean they are getting hundreds of clicks a day, most likely only 16 impressions a month with a total of 12 clicks.

So when it comes down to it, there really is no good, bad, or average, it’s all relative. The successful measure of a good CTR, is totally dependant on how competitive, and how targeted the keyword. The important thing is to keep above that 1.0% mark.

Not to Miss!
In the Client Spotlight this Week: Avianation - Pilot Jobs and Aviation Careers

If you are looking for employment in the Aeronautics industry, have we got the website for you!

"Tired of spending hours each day looking for a job within the aviation industry? Is your aviation career at a standstill? Let us help! AviaNation.com is a single source of aviation employment information with many exciting and hard to find jobs posted every day. We list jobs for pilots, flight attendants, mechanics, airline training and ground operations, and many more aviation professions." (from avianation.com)

Visit Avianation.Com if you are looking for aviation jobs and employment opportunities around the world. Jobs for pilots, mechanics, flight attendants, and many other professions.

Weekly Quick Tip: How To Set A Table For Company

When you are designing (or redesigning) your website, one of the first things you will do is create your table structure. This structure, upon which the look, feel, and design will be based, is arguably one of the most important aspects of your site and will set the stage for its optimization.

The importance of the table structure comes from how the search engine spiders crawl your site. Basically they will enter your site and read it like you are reading this tip, from top to bottom, left to right. This sounds fairly straightforward however when we get into the real world, with tables inside tables, images, scripts, etc thrown in it can become a bit more difficult than it might first appear.

In a very basic website structure you would have a table with 4 cells. It would look like:

1 - Header
2- Navigation 3 - Content
4 - Footer

In this case the spider would come to your site and read cell 1. This cell would traditionally have the header image and little else. Make sure to at least put an alt tag on your header so the spider has something to see in its first stop on your page.

Next the spider would see cell 2, the navigation bar. If you have an image based navigation bar you have once again left the spider very little to “eat” in its second stop. Text links in this area can help (if properly worded) but may not be possible while maintaining the look and feel of your site. Any tables inside this cell will be read before the spider moves on to cell 3.

Finally, the spider will get to cell 3 where the “meat” of the page lies (i.e. the content). The search engine considers where on a page the key content lies. The higher up on the page that your relevant text lies, the greater the weight it is given. When we make a spider work to get to that content, the weight it is given drops.

And lastly, the spider will get to the footer (cell 4). The fact that this content is the last thing the spider will see is fine and makes this a useful spot. This is where you can place text-links to internal pages (for ease of spidering), copyright information, and other content that you want to have on your page but which isn’t of high important from a content priority perspective.

If your site is designed with roughly the above-noted structure you are in the majority. This is good as the structure can be improved upon to attain an advantage over those who are not reading this and who don’t know that a couple simple changes to the structure can give you that little advantage that will push you higher in the rankings.

For a site with the above-noted table structure, the simple addition of an extra cell can give you just that push. Rather than using the structure indicated slight modifications will give you a structure similar to:

1 - Header
2 - Blank 3 - Content
4 - Navigation
5 - Footer

With this structure we have simply added a cell above the navigation bar. This may seem small but the effect on how the spider reads your site can be significant.

The first thing the spider will see will still be the header. This is the case in the vast majority of sites. You can certainly add a bit of text here as well, though most webmasters don’t as this can negatively affect the look and feel of the site. If possible it is recommended, however if it’s not possible you only have a simple image, Flash file, or the such and this won’t hider you in any significant manner.

When the spider gets to the second cell it will find it blank (probably with a simple blank image). Nothing significant and so the spider will move on. Rather than proceeding to the navigation bar the spider will travel to the cell to the right of it, which is … your content. You have now cut down significantly the amount of information that the spider will be reading before it gets to this extremely important cell. This has now moved the priority placed on the content up. The content itself will still have to be well optimized however, all else being equal, you will win a ranking competition based solely on the fact that your content will be read as more significant (higher on the page) that that of your competition.

The spider will then move on to the navigation (cell 4) and down to cell 5, the footer.

These may seem like simple changes and they are. That said, if this gives your site the extra 1% difference that takes it from #7 to #4 or from #11 to #9 then wasn’t it well worth the few minutes that it took to apply this change to your template?

It isn’t possible to give examples of all the various table structures here in this tip however the above noted examples should give you a good idea of how tables can used to maximize the effectiveness of your content for search engine rankings. If you have any questions about your site specifically please feel free to email me by clicking on my name, below this article.

The Net Reality: Goofy Guy Goes to Jail for trying to Extort Google

They say time is money but in this case, I think Michael Anthony Bradley would rather have money as opposed to the time he is likely to earn in one of California's penal institutions. (more like a time-share with overcrowding. - JH)

Michael Anthony Bradley is a sorry man today. He thought he would make a good deal of money threatening Google but, instead, he got a good deal of trouble. Bradley, aged 32, developed a program called "Google Clique" which was designed to surf ads displayed through Google AdSense and click them in order to thwart the accuracy of Google's click-counters. If used by a webmaster who's site shows ads drawn from AdSense, Bradley's website stated that Google Clique could generate revenues of up to $3,000 per month.

The Wall St. Journal reported that Bradley met with Google engineers in March and demanded $100,000. If Google did not pay, Bradley threatened to release his software live on the web for use of spammers and other malicious users.

The US Secret Service, which deals with interstate mail and wire fraud, recorded the March meeting and arrested Bradley earlier this week. He has been released on $50,000 bail under conditions that keep him far away from computers, the Internet and Google employees.



Visit the SEO BLOG Regularly for Daily SEO Tips & Updates
SEO Blog - SEO Tips

If you have any questions please do not hesitate to call the StepForth staff:
Toll-Free: 1-877-385-5526 | Local: 385-1190
http://www.stepforth.com


To unsubscribe from this weekly newsletter simply reply to news@stepforth.com and include "unsubscribe" as the subject